Alex De Minaur Grows Up

Alex De Minaur Grows Up

Alex De Minaur
Grows Up

The Demon syncs his mind and body.

The Demon syncs his mind
and body.

By Giri Nathan
March 8, 2024

Alex De Minaur works off In-N-Out burgers at Indian Wells / David Bartholow

Alex De Minaur works off In-N-Out burgers at Indian Wells / David Bartholow

We might look back at this season as the one where the 25-year-old Alex De Minaur grew up, and grew into his tennis. In January, at home in Australia, he made the top 10, territory I thought might always elude him. I can’t call to mind an alleged six-footer with a more 5-foot-9 presence on the court. The speed was always there; nobody on tour would ever doubt the Demon in a footrace. But it didn’t always seem that his mind and his body were in alignment. I sometimes felt like I was watching a player with the game plan of a big hitter and the actual physical tools of a Gilles Simon-esque grinder. De Minaur used his speed to set up his hyper-flat attacks, but lacked the power to make those attacks to hurt the best opponents…and then he’d have to run around and hit more balls. Those flat strokes and tireless chase-downs made for fun highlights and occasional upsets, but they had only once put him in the second week of a major. He looked like a top 20 player, which is what he’d been, until very recently.

The Australian has recently put a noticeable amount of meat on his bones; that’s got to be grueling work for someone of his build undergoing the grind and caloric drain of tour life. In a 2023 interview he said that he’d gained four or five kilograms since 2019, and he looks a little beefier still than he did last year. Now there’s a lot more pop on his ground strokes and the serve. As proof, the ur-returner Novak Djokovic managed to win only one point off his first serve in a loss to De Minaur in January. (De Minaur has won 66.0 percent of service points so far this year, up from 64.0 percent in 2023 and 62.5 percent in 2022, per Tennis Abstract. These tiny margins are everything in tennis.) This new and improved Demon made it to the final in Rotterdam, losing to Jannik Sinner, perhaps the only guy on tour who’s having a more auspicious start to the year than him. Then, in Acapulco, he proved himself better than his neighbors in the third tier of players on tour, taking out Casper Ruud and Stefanos Tsitsipas, who lie on either side of his No. 10 ranking. That was his second straight Acapulco title.

It’s what this wholesome fellow De Minaur did immediately after winning that tournament that really elevates this story to peak wholesomeness. As he described it: He won the Acapulco final, finished media at 1 a.m., stayed up to pack, and got on a 6:20 a.m. flight to Tijuana, then crossed the border to San Diego, arriving around 10:30 a.m., to watch his girlfriend Katie Boulter play her first 500-level final that day. In a testament to the logistical hellishness of dating across pro tennis tours, this was the first time De Minaur had caught one of her matches live, two years into their relationship.

Good fortune must be contagious, because the 27-year-old Boulter had the best week of her tennis life. Heading into the tournament, she had managed nine wins over top 50 opponents over her career; she picked up five more such wins in San Diego alone, including the tournament’s second, seventh, third, and sixth seeds. When she’s really letting her forehand rip, it’s utterly commanding and hypnotic. Boulter took on an in-form Marta Kostyuk in the final, with De Minaur looking on in the stands. By set 2 it was clearly going to be a godly forehand day for the Brit. She held up her end of the deal, and the couple secured matching 500-level titles last weekend. They celebrated at In-N-Out. Boulter is now at a career-high ranking of No. 27, which will earn her seeds at big tournaments for the first time. Their careers are rising in unison. There will be no repeated dual magic in Indian Wells—Boulter bowed out in the first round—but at least they can still go to In-N-Out if they want.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.



The Hopper

—Simona Halep appealed her doping ban…and won.

—A pre-Wimbledon WTA event may return to the The Queens Club.

—Taylor Fritz is with Hugo Boss now.

—Rafael Nadal’s comeback stalls—yet again—at Indian Wells.

—The self-described Taste of Tennis interviews
Maria Timofeeva and Jonny Levine on the Craig Shapiro Tennis Podcast.

—ICYMI: Vicente Muñoz’s postcard from Buenos Aires.

—Brittani Sonnenberg’s report from the Austin Open.

—The Reebok Pump is back.



SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.


Reebok Is Here to Pump...You Up

Reebok Is Here to Pump...You Up

The classic Court Victory Pump is coming back to take on those rock and roll tennis guys.

The classic Court Victory Pump is coming back to take on those rock and roll tennis guys.

By Tim Newcomb
March 1, 2024

Image courtesy of Reebok

Image courtesy of Reebok

Michael Chang started pumping his Reeboks in 1990. For the first time since 2016, Reebok invites us all to do the same, as they are set to release a retro version of the tennis-specific Court Victory Pump in white, green, and yellow on March 15. 

The Pump and Hexalite—a honeycomb-shaped cushioning system—both make a return. And the yellow tennis ball again serves as the pumping mechanism on the tongue, easily the most powerful technology/style tie-in across the history of the sport’s sneakers. The midcut height and TPU and rubber reinforcement across the shoe’s upper give us a true retro feel on the Court Victory Pump. 

The Reebok Pump technology created cultural cachet shortly after it was introduced at the end of 1989. It was worn by Dominique Wilkins while he won the NBA slam dunk contest in 1990 and then the next year when Dee Brown paused during the contest to pump up his Reeboks before winning the 1991 iteration. But basketball wasn’t the only home for the pump, as Reebok outfitted Chang in the tennis-specific Court Victory Pump, a sneaker statement he first made at the 1990 French Open as the tennis ball pump mechanism popped from his shoes. 

Since that time Reebok has sent the retro into the wild a handful of times, the most recent version released in 2016. Now we get a retro version of the Court Victory Pump, available for $160, complete with the famous tech and ’90s-inspired style.  

Really, though, all we really care about is that tennis ball pump. Now we have it. 

Follow Tim Newcomb’s tennis gear coverage on Instagram at Felt Alley Tennis.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.


Reporter's Notebook: The ATX Open in Austin

Reporter's Notebook: The ATX Open in Austin

Notes and observations from the live music capital.

Notes and observations from the live music capital.

By BRITTANI SONNENBERG
March 1, 2024

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.


Get Off Carlos Alcaraz’s Lawn

Get Off Carlos Alcaraz’s Lawn

Joao Fonseca and Jakub Mensik are making moves.

Joao Fonseca and Jakub Mensik are making moves.

By Giri Nathan
February 23, 2024

Take a bow, Joao Fonseca, you’re the first player born in 2006 to win a tour-level match // Associated Press

Take a bow, Joao Fonseca, you’re the first player born in 2006 to win a tour-level match // Associated Press

February is a sleepy phase of the tennis calendar. What better use for it than to showcase the future? Teens are making moves on the ATP tour this week, and it’s almost enough to start looking at Carlos Alcaraz—who retired with an ankle sprain in Rio but said he’ll be back in time for Indian Wells—as a grizzled old man by comparison. Soon enough he’s gonna be yelling at these two to get off his lawn (in southwest London).

This week in Rio, the 17-year-old Joao Fonseca got a wild card into the tournament that’s held just 10 minutes from his house, and he’s put it to good use. Fonseca, currently the No. 2-ranked junior, is not long for the juniors; no chance he delivers on his commitment to play at UVA this fall, either, because he seems ready for the genuine article. On Wednesday he became the first player born in 2006 to win a tour-level match. Which led me to wonder: How many players have ever won a bagel set in their second-ever tour-level match? Fonseca whupped his first-round opponent Arthur Fils—an immensely talented 19-year-old prospect in his own right—on a drizzly evening with a delirious home crowd, 6–0, 6–4. (On that note: Brazilian crowds make me feel like I’m watching gladiatorial combat, but in a good way. Someone should take the Miami Open out of that accursed parking lot and drop it somewhere here.)

Fonseca backed that up with a win on Thursday over Christian Garin, 6–4, 6–4, becoming the youngest ATP quarterfinalist in a decade, and there were a few shots in this one that made me consider calling the authorities. Forget the eye test, I swear by the ear test, and we’re getting some Jannik Sinner-ish readings on the monitors, though I suspect Fonseca is even further along developmentally than Sinner was at age 17. Technique is wonderful on both wings; racquet head speed is bonkers; winners are spurting out of nowhere. Serve is perhaps a little idiosyncratic, but the rest of the repertoire is so scary I’d be a little surprised if he wasn’t a top 10 dude by the age of 20. Next up on Friday is a winnable quarterfinal match against world No. 113 Mariano Novana. You’ll be seeing a lot of this kid, soon.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.

A free iPhone AND wins over three top 50 opponents for Jakub Mensik in Doha. // Associated Press.

A free iPhone AND wins over three top 50 opponents for Jakub Mensik in Doha. // Associated Press.

Elsewhere in auspicious wild-card news, the 18-year-old Jakub Mensik should thank a cool new ATP policy for his joy in Doha this week. The Next Gen Accelerator Programme, which sounds like a tool for particle physics, is actually just a way to boost good players under the age of 20. If you’re ranked inside the top 250, and there are three tour events happening in a given week, you can now get a wild card into a 250-level event (once) or its qualifying draw (twice). Mensik, who was ranked No. 116 in the world at the start of the week and has had some interesting wins over the past few months, signed right up. He said he picked Doha specifically because he got a free iPhone out of the deal. As an added bonus, he also got wins over three top 50 players, which he’d never accomplished even once before.

If Mensik only took out Alexander Davidovich Fokina in the first round, dayenu, but instead he kept going. I’ll leave it to the reader to decide how much it means for a player to beat Andy Murray at this moment in his career. While Murray appears to have developed an unseemly addiction to losing close matches—he will be reliving the botched gimme volley on set point in the first set—he did put up a tough fight, and it was high-level stuff from Mensik to win in three tiebreaks.

Even then, there’s a sizable gap between beating those two guys and beating Andrey Rublev on a hard court. The Rublev experience is difficult to simulate; the power of “bweh” must be experienced firsthand, as there aren’t many players maintaining that raw pace from first point to last. It’s the sort of tennis that tends to blow away an unprepared foe. Somehow Mensik stood on the baseline and tracked the ball as if he’d been practicing against the Rublev forehand his whole life. Mensik’s tolerance for long, punishing rallies is a testament to his very sturdy baseline game, and the 6-foot-4 Czech backed it up with an excellent serve, which Rublev didn’t manage to break once in the match. Mensik won 6–4, 7–6(6) and made his first ATP semifinal, where he’ll play Gael Monfils, who, incidentally, went pro the year before Mensik was born.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.



The Hopper

—Coco Gauff is one of Time magazine’s women of the year.

—Ivo Karlovic has officially retired.

—Jon Wertheim profiles Novak Djokovic, whom he declares the best ever.

—James Blake has been sanctioned for a gambling endorsement, and he’s not the first.

—Oh, dear. Tennis officials have “strongly recommended” players don’t leave the tournament grounds during the Mexican Open.

—A trailer for “Challengers” has been released.

—Giri Nathan moves out.



SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.


Postcard from Buenos Aires

Postcard from
Buenos Aires

Photographer Vicente Muñoz checks in from the Argentina Open.

Photographer Vicente Muñoz checks in from the Argentina Open.

Photography by Vicente Muñoz
February 18, 2024

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.


Naomi Osaka Comes Back Sharp(ish)

Naomi Osaka Comes Back Sharp(ish)

The former world number one returns to a vastly different tennis landscape.

The former world number one returns to a vastly different tennis landscape.

By Giri Nathan
February 16, 2024

Naomi Osaka is getting ever closer to beating Karolina Pliskova. / Associated Press

Naomi Osaka is getting ever closer to beating Karolina Pliskova. / Associated Press

Coming into this year, I had a series of interrelated questions about a returning champ. What level of Naomi Osaka would we see after her long break from competition? And: How does that version of Osaka stack up against a tour of a slightly scarier composition than the one she left behind? And: How would she handle that potential culture shock? The good part is that we’d get clear answers from Osaka’s characteristically unguarded and impressionistic press conferences. (Even though she has historically had her issues with those, she’s great at them!)

It was difficult to imagine Osaka waltzing back into the top 10. I figured there’d be a phase for her to find her legs and rhythm again, and then another (potentially more complicated and demoralizing) phase where she puzzled out how to beat the new top-end competition. The landscape has gotten wilder in the three years since her last title. Ash Barty has retired, extinguishing one hypothetical rivalry, but nothing else about the job description has gotten any easier. Iga Swiatek and Aryna Sabalenka have upgraded their tennis beyond recognition; Elena Rybakina is a thing now; Coco Gauff is no longer someone to extend a gracious microphone to after an emotional loss, but a major champ and nightmare to hit through; the whole top 30 is stuffed with talent that could run an unprepared Osaka out of her previous roost at the top of tennis.

Osaka would have to come back sharp. No easy task for someone who hadn’t competed at that level in some 15 months and had candidly discussed the challenges of physical recovery after childbirth in July. “Having a baby completely destroys your pelvic floor,” Osaka told Glamour in January. “I was shocked, because I couldn’t get up out of my bed. I had to roll sideways, and it was a really long process because, for me, my immediate way of thinking is: To rebuild this I have to do a lot of sit-ups. And I learned that that’s totally not what you’re supposed to do. You’re supposed to do deep pelvic-floor work.” She shared clips of her practices, bloopers and all, in the latter months of 2023.

When she hit the courts in Australia, Osaka proved both how much work she’d already put in and how much work there was still to do in order to match her old glory. In Brisbane she looked deadly from the baseline, if perhaps a half step slow; she won her first match, against Tamara Korpatsch, and lost the second to a diminished Karolina Pliskova. Coming into the Australian Open with a protected ranking of No. 45, Osaka ran straight into No. 5 seed Carolina Garcia, who was having One Of Those Carolina Garcia Nights, where the serve is profoundly untouchable and there’s a prohibition against rallies longer than four balls. “I felt like I was constantly on my back foot and really hesitant,” Osaka said after her straight-set loss to a hyperaggressive Garcia. “I was a little bit overthinking in my head where to go. I think that’s something that will come in time, but right now it kind of sucks a little.”

Then it was onto Abu Dhabi, where Osaka played Danielle Collins. A competitive start degraded into a rout, as Collins strung together nine straight games to win the match. “I say some pretty harsh words about myself. I know the word, but if I say it, it sounds really bad. I felt a little like a ‘failure,’ but I don’t want to be too harsh,” Osaka said after. She said she was less confident, but not so unconfident that she couldn’t play good tennis. “I really think I just need to get through a really tough match and then sort of acknowledge that that’s going to happen quite a couple of times.”

This week in Doha, she got the reps she was looking for, against some familiar faces. First off, she avenged last month’s loss against Carolina Garcia. On her second go, Osaka returned better—she said she’d adopted some new footwork technique from Novak Djokovic—and moved better in the rallies, generally doing a more convincing impression of her old self. She kept at it with her second-round win over Petra Martic, digging out of a hole in the second-set tiebreak to secure the first back-to-back wins of her comeback. After benefiting from a walkover, Osaka advanced to a quarterfinal against (once again) Karolina Pliskova, in a battle of diminished former world No. 1s. The result? Another close loss for Osaka, just like last month, this time in two tiebreaks. These consistent checks against the same opponents are useful as a kind of benchmark. Osaka’s status is clear enough: can now beat Garcia on a good day, but still working on the rebounding Pliskova. Not so bad a place to be a month into the comeback.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.



The Hopper

—Naomi (and Barbora Krejcikova) have pulled out of Dubai.

—New York magazine has profiled Bill Ackman, who is funding the PTPA.

—Simona Halep is suing a supplement maker.

—Rafael Nadal says he did not, in fact, sell out.

—ICYMI: “Coach” Craig Shapiro gets candid with tennis mom Aneke Rune.



SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.


Andy Murray Doesn't Need A Guidance Counselor

Andy Murray Doesn't Need A Guidance Counselor

Legacies are not made in the first round of the Open Sud de France!

Legacies are not made in the first round of the Open Sud de France!

By Giri Nathan
February 9, 2024

Every picture tells a story, don't it? / Associated Press

Every picture tells a story, don't it? / Associated Press

Some people will sit down at a keyboard and beg Andy Murray to retire. This is no way to spend a writing life. There has only ever been one worthwhile piece of writing calling for retirement—it was composed by Danny DeVito—but typists the world over continue to churn out their insignificant contributions to this doomed genre. Tennis’ latest such piece, which triggered its current tedious media cycle, is a BBC Scotland column from last week written by Kheredine Idessane. The headline poses a question about Andy Murray: “Is the end nigh for three-time Grand Slam winner after latest loss?” The column is written by a longtime close observer of Murray, but it is, ultimately, still a column asking an athlete to retire, out of some misplaced concern for the athlete’s legacy, and that makes it very silly, if perhaps less retrospectively stupid than the famous 2013 column asking Roger Federer to retire. (He had another productive decade in him, it turned out.)

“Safeguarding his own mental health must surely come into play alongside preserving his reputation,” writes Idessane. Murray, who is probably more focused on safeguarding his mental health from these kinds of articles than from tennis losses, replied to the writer with predictable indignation. “Tarnishing my legacy? Do me a favour. I’m in a terrible moment right now, I’ll give you that. Most people would quit and give up in my situation right now. But I’m not most people and my mind works differently. I won’t quit. I will keep fighting and working to produce the performances I know I’m capable of.” Peers like Andy Roddick rode to Murray’s defense, as the big-serving American referred to the beleaguered Scot as an “accomplished iconic adult,” which is a compliment so stilted I want to borrow it as a résumé topline. True to his word, Murray has not since quit. He has continued entering all the obscure tournaments of February. He has said he will go back down to the Challenger tour if he needs to.

Because this much is undeniable: Andy Murray cannot win an ATP match at present. The BBC column was inspired by his loss last week at Montpelier to Benoit Paire, the dissipated Frenchman who himself had not won a tour-level match for a year and a half. Murray lost his first-round match this week, too. He has now lost in the first round of seven of his last eight events, going back to last fall. What the talk of “legacy” glosses right over is the totally fair observation that Andy Murray stinks right now! That’s the reality on court; there’s no need to mash that accurate observation into the tortured framework of “legacy” or “safeguarding mental health.” And if what you are trying to say is that Murray’s stinking makes you personally uncomfortable, then a poem or talk therapy session might be a better outlet than a straight-faced request that he retire.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.

Who wears short shorts? Tomas Machac, that's who. / Associated Press

Who wears short shorts? Tomas Machac, that's who. / Associated Press

Just as Murray is free to work, you are free to construct that column about his poor play. Talk about the flagging second serve, a liability even in the best parts of his career and now barely workable some days, as in his Australian Open loss to Tomas Etcheverry, where he won just 33 percent of points behind it. Add in Murray’s observation that he’s playing phenomenal tennis in his practice sets but can’t seem to make it stick in competition. Whatever you do, just talk about the actual tennis he’s playing. Because I am not sure that the argument about legacy-tarnishing is all that clear on the mechanisms by which legacies are made. Hint: Legacies are not made in the first round of the Open Sud de France! This metal hip era is not going to somehow melt his Olympic gold medals. I don’t think the historians of tennis are going to skimp out on praise for a three-time major champ and all-time great because they were thunderstruck by the sudden memory of him losing to Tomas Machac at Marseille that one time.

But while I have you, let’s talk about that loss to Tomas Machac at Marseille. Those paying attention know that this isn’t such a dire loss anyway, because the 23-year-old Machac is one of the fastest risers on the ATP, in addition to being an avowed member of the short-shorts community. Early last year Machac nearly took out Djokovic in a third-set tiebreak in Dubai, turning heads with the quality of his aggressive tennis; this year he has already brought his best to Melbourne, with a straight-sets dismissal of Frances Tiafoe in round 2 and a tight loss to Karen Khachanov in round 3. Machac is a fleet-footed, flexible, frisky player who likes a decisive net rush and looks brilliant on fast courts. Not terribly surprising that he beat Murray, or that he followed it up with a win over Lorenzo Musetii. Fun watch, already inside the top 70, and should be moving much higher if this breakout is real. I can’t wait to see him thrive and someday bray for his retirement.



The Hopper

—“Coach” Craig Shapiro gets candid with tennis mom Aneke Rune.

—Any takers for The Tennis Channel?

—Move over Wimbledon, the 6 Kings Slam is coming. And the WTA Finals will probably follow it to Saudi Arabia.

—Simona Halep is fighting for her career.

—Alexander Zverev’s upcoming trial looms over his recent success, says Giri in Defector.



SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.


At Long Last, Short Shorts Are Back

At Long Last, Short Shorts Are Back

After years of downward creep, hemlines are finally getting smaller.

After years of downward creep, hemlines are finally getting smaller.

By Saikeerthi Rachavelpula
February 2, 2024

When a sprightly young player makes their professional debut, they don’t just announce themselves with big serves and, if they’re lucky, a big result. They make themselves known with their looks as much as their talent. The same goes for more established players looking to turn things around with a breakout performance. For many, the hope is that looking like a new player might actually make you one. 

After a disappointing 2023 season, Holger Rune’s 2024 Australian Open began by embracing the biggest menswear trend of the summer: short shorts. For years, Holger has been hoisting up his shorts to their physical limit, and it seems in the new year, he finally found the confidence to ask Nike for a shorter inseam. 

Paired with a salmon sleeveless, Holger’s viral 5-inch inseams display a blithe disregard for the pressures of the occasion, reminding us that shorts were originally for schoolboys and beach goers. But this is not all they remind us of because this is not the first time we have witnessed short shorts on a tennis court.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.

New shorts, New Holger. / Associated Press.

New shorts, New Holger. / Associated Press.

Holger’s 5-inch inseams are the modern descendants of the retro briefs worn by legends like John McEnroe and Yannick Noah. Indeed, Holger’s are only made possible by a long history of men’s tennis shorts and their indelible mark on the game. 

Less than a century ago, shorts were introduced to the game of tennis. Weighed down by the traditional on-court dress code of flannel trousers and cable-knit sweaters, in 1932, Englishman Henry Wilfred “Bunny” Austin became the first to ditch the heavy outwear in favor of shorts. A shock to the priggish Wimbledon grounds, an irritated porter whispered to him, “Excuse me, Mr. Austin, but I think you’ve forgotten your trousers.”

Bunny Austin was the first player to wear shorts at Wimbledon / Associated Press

Bunny Austin was the first player to wear shorts at Wimbledon / Associated Press

After this initial infraction, it didn’t take long for others to follow suit. As the game became more physical, shorts presented a clear advantage. Liberated from the material constraints of excess fabric, players were able to move more freely while also remaining cool.  

Around the same time, aggressive baseliners like Jimmy Connors emerged, departing from the usual serve-and-volley game style. A greater range in playing style paved the way for a greater emphasis on the individuality of players. This led to one of the most iconic outfits in tennis history: Bjorn Borg’s winning 1979 Wimbledon outfit, consisting of short shorts, a tight-fitting pin-stripe polo, and a long, voluminous hairdo barely controlled by a red-and-blue-striped headband. 

Eventually, shorts went from technological innovation to what sociologist Michel Foucault called a “technology of self”—a tool by which “men transform themselves” and “make their life [into] an oeuvre.” During the Tennis Boom of the ’70s and ’80s, this principle culminated in short shorts acting as a blank canvas for players to forge newfound identities. Borg’s solidified his playboy status. Ashe’s completed his clean-cut, collegiate look. And Agassi’s memorialized him as tennis’ own Tonya Harding.

Arthur Ashe’s short shorts completed his clean-cut, collegiate look. / Getty

Arthur Ashe’s short shorts completed his clean-cut, collegiate look. / Getty

In the 2000s, however, short shorts were cast aside in favor of longer inseams. With his signature capris, Nadal did to tennis shorts what Michael Jordan did to basketball shorts. Before Jordan, players like Larry Bird and Magic Johnson sported 3-inch inseams. Jordan, however, opted for baggier, knee-length shorts. Legend has it that this preference arose from his habit of tugging at his shorts while playing defense, a tic famously shared by none other than the King of Clay.

In 1984, Larry Bird favored a 3-inch inseam. / Associated Press

In 1984, Larry Bird favored a 3-inch inseam. / Associated Press

In a 2005 ESPN article on Nadal’s French Open fashion choice, Nadal explained that his capris were initially selected by Nike, but they made such an impression on him that he decided to continue wearing them. The baggy, over-the-knee style resembled the cargos worn by soldiers on a battlefield. This militant quality organically suited Nadal’s relentless and physical approach to the game while emphatically dismissing critics’ concerns that the garment constricted his movement. 

Thus, short shorts had met their match. Though only few, if any, adopted Nadal’s capris, the natural, homogenizing tendency for athletes to mimic the winning tactics of their opponents meant that more and more players embraced longer, looser styles hitting right above the knee. Soon enough, baggy basketball-like shorts were the favored fashion, with spandex underneath. In an interview with GQ magazine, Djokovic notes that short shorts aren’t very comfortable for the “muscle-y thighs” and overall larger physiques of today’s newer generation of players.

A low point for short shorts–or should we say high water mark. / Associated Press

A low point for short shorts–or should we say high water mark. / Associated Press

In this way, the history of men’s tennis shorts is one of both adaptation and reinvention, allowing players to adapt to increasing physical demands while offering a means by which they can stand out and feel more comfortable on court. 

Despite his early second-round exit to the French youngster Arthur Cazaux at this year’s Australian Open, Holger assured a reporter that the short shorts are here to stay. He seems to be following in the fashion footsteps of a late-stage Nadal nearing the end of his career. At this point, Nadal felt he was no longer “a kid anymore,” ditching his signature capris for a mid-length 7-inch inseam. For Nadal, the shorter cut represented his symbolic growth as a player and proved to the world that he still possessed the talent he initially became famous for.

A 7-inch inseam feels short on the lanky Jannik Sinner. / Associated Press

A 7-inch inseam feels short on the lanky Jannik Sinner. / Associated Press

While the history of men’s tennis shorts showcases the garment’s mutability, shorts will always embody the effortless life of leisure at the very heart of the sport. As preppy tennis styles reenter mainstream fashion, one can only hope that Holger’s winning shorts are followed by some actual wins. Until then, we will have to settle for Jannik Sinner’s 7-inch inseams, which just so happen to appear much shorter on his long, lanky legs.



The Hopper

—Missing the Australian Open? Here’s Gerald Marzorati on the champ, Aryna Sabalenka, and Giri Nathan on Jannik Sinner.

—Tennis is still protecting Alexander Zverev, says Ben Rothenberg.

—Venus Williams wants to come back at Indian Wells, while Paula Badosa has another setback.

—Andy Roddick has a new podcast.

—Please let Andy Murray live.

—This year’s Miami Open will feature wheelchair tennis (winner) and professional pickleball (unforced error).

RIP Sports Illustrated



SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.


Another Dip in Hot Lava

Another Dip in Hot Lava

The OG Air Tech Challenge 2 is making a comeback.

The OG Air Tech Challenge 2 is making a comeback.

By Tim Newcomb
January 26, 2024

Image courtesy of Nike

Image courtesy of Nike

When you mine tennis nostalgia, you’re bound to churn up hot lava. That’s exactly what Nike has planned for a 2024 retro release of the 1990 Air Tech Challenge 2 “Hot Lava,” made famous by Andre Agassi. 

The innovative sneaker debuted on Agassi’s feet in California in early 1990 before really turning heads at the French Open later that year. Along with the three-quarter height, synthetic leather, visible Nike Air bubble for the first time in Nike tennis, and unique lock-down design, the shoe featured splashes of pink and black dubbed Hot Lava. 

Arguably the most famous shoe in the history of Nike tennis, the brand released a retro version first in 2008, then again in 2014. We saw more versions in 2016 and a limited run in 2019. The Jordan Brand borrowed the pattern in 2018 for a Legacy 312 and a LeBron 16 released in 2019 with a nod to the colorway. 

As first reported by Sneaker Files, the 2024 version will launch in fall, which places it likely around the US Open, which this year had Nike flashing new Mac Attack retro colorways and teasing a Supreme-exclusive Courtposite that is now available. Agassi himself has been seen around the Australian Open this year, so expect to see more of the tennis legend throughout 2024. 

The 2024 Hot Lava may include some vintage coloring that gives it a different hue from the original, including the potential for “phantom” and “pale ivory” added to the design. No matter the final tones, Nike has a tennis sneaker still exciting fans more than three decades later.

Follow Tim Newcomb’s tennis gear coverage on Instagram at Felt Alley Tennis.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.


Dominance and Bedlam at the Australian Open

Dominance and Bedlam at the Australian Open

This Australian Open draw tells twin stories of an evolving WTA.

This Australian Open draw tells twin stories of an evolving WTA.

By Giri Nathan
January 26, 2024

Aryna Sabalenka has cruised into her second straight Australian Open final / Associated Press

Aryna Sabalenka has cruised into her second straight Australian Open final / Associated Press

This Australian Open draw tells twin stories of an evolving WTA. Dominance is beginning to solidify at the top of the tour in a way we haven’t seen in years…and yet, there’s still plenty of bedlam to keep things spicy.

The bottom half of the draw maintained order. Seeded players generally kept it together and took care of business for at least a round or two. There was space for the occasional thrilling breakout, courtesy of hyped teens of the past (Amanda Anisimova) and present (Mirra Andreeva), but the elite of the elite serenely slashed their way to the semifinal, a showdown between Aryna Sabalenka and Coco Gauff. In terms of narrative continuity, it’s a joy to see some repeat customers in the late rounds of these Slams. And it’s no real surprise to see these two picking up right where they left off in the US Open final. In this match they comfortably surpassed the quality of their duel in New York—leaving some of the nerves behind, ratcheting up the execution—and Sabalenka took it in two taut sets. I’ll happily watch a dozen more rounds of this offense vs. defense clash over the next few seasons. Sabalenka emerged having won 26 of her last 27 sets in Melbourne.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.

Meanwhile, the top half of the draw embraced chaos. One key disruptor was the 19-year-old Linda Noskova, a long-rumored talent self-actualizing with flair. She overpowered the world No. 1, Iga Swiatek, caught a little luck with an Elina Svitolina retirement, and bowed out of her quarterfinal in tears, but previewed a significant career to come. In large part the chaos in this half was supplied by Dayana Yastremska, whose mere presence in the tournament wasn’t to be taken for granted, given that she was down a break in the third set of her last match in the qualifying rounds. She survived, though, then dove as deep into the main draw of a Slam as any qualifier in history besides Emma Raducanu in 2021. Newcomers were alerted to Yastremska’s rich history: a former No. 21 ranking, sudden retirements from matches while on the precipice of defeat, a side hustle in pop music, a positive test for an anabolic steroid that was later cleared with a “kissing” defense even more memorable than Richard Gasquet’s, and a Ukrainian home life disrupted by Russian belligerence. She took out two major champs. By the fourth round, rising star Qinwen Zheng was the highest-ranked player remaining in this half of the draw, and she was its last survivor, dispatching Yastremska in their semifinal.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.

All that left us with a compelling final: Sabalenka vs. Zheng; No. 2 seed vs. No. 12; a 25-year-old in her gasp-inducing prime vs. a talented 21-year-old who reached this level slightly ahead of schedule. They’re two of the tour’s heaviest ball-strikers, as Zheng gins up huge topspin with a western forehand grip like Swiatek’s. Both are also high-powered servers who’ve had some demons with the second serve, and while Sabalenka has left her incessant double faults in the past, Zheng is still doing some troubleshooting. Their journeys to the final were quite different. Sabalenka has faced two other major champions ranked in the top 10 and hasn’t dropped a set in the tournament; only Gauff had managed to pry at least four games off her in a set. Whereas Zheng’s unusual path to the final did not include an opponent ranked in the top 50, making it hard to assess her level with much confidence. (Perhaps the closest Zheng got to a former major champ in the last fortnight was a charming run-in with her idol and countrywoman Li Na, who won her Australian Open exactly a decade ago; there’s an awesome photo of Zheng watching that win on TV as a kid.) 

Qinwen Zheng’s path to the final did not include a top 50 opponent. / Associated Press

Qinwen Zheng’s path to the final did not include a top 50 opponent. / Associated Press

These two have met only once before, in the quarterfinal of last year’s US Open, which Sabalenka won without much fuss. Sabalenka’s baseline game is likely sturdier at the moment, and she’ll be the favorite as she looks to defend her title. Zheng, the tournament’s ace leader, will have to serve with conviction to keep Sabalenka’s hyper-aggressive returns in check. Expect some brutal and brief points in this final, aces and hissing winners in abundance. Whoever wins, that poor tennis ball loses.

SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.



The Hopper

—If you haven’t had enough Meddy, here’s Giri on his epic win over Hubie Hurkacz earlier in the week.

—Rafael Nadal will continue his comeback in Doha next month.

—ESPN offers a primer on the Alexander Zverev domestic abuse charges.

Nick Kyrgios opens up, as they say, in the Sydney Morning Herald.

—Jon Wertheim has some choice words for Margaret Court.

—Billie Jean King still has a lot to say, from The Cut.

—ICYMI: Tim Newcomb’s Australian Open shoe report.



SIGN UP — YOU'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR SECOND SERVE.